高校课程育人:本真、理路与评价
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

2021年重庆市高等教育教学改革研究重大项目“高校课程思政建设范式与策略研究”(221042)


The High Quality of Curriculum Education: Authentic Meaning, Theoretical Methods, and Impact Assessment
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    立德树人居于学校教育发展全局的核心位置,需要将其落实到课程育人的生动实践中。但是,在课程育人的具体实践中,仍有部分教师将其简单化为“课程+育人”的生硬结合,导致课程育人容易陷入理论教条窠臼。为此,高校教师应充分认识到高校课程育人在目标要求、重点内容、转型路径上的人性化、时代化和数字化本真意蕴,从教师素养、课程建设、课堂教学三个方面开展育人实践。在此基础上,针对具体课程的育人效果而言,可以从目标设定、内容选择、方法实施、结果呈现等方面进行评价,从而进一步推动课程育人的生动实践。

    Abstract:

    Cultivating virtue and nurturing talents is at the core of the overall high-quality development of education, and it is necessary to implement it in the vivid practice of curriculum education. However, in the specific practice of curriculum education, some teachers still simplify it as a rigid combination of “curriculum+education”, which leads to curriculum education easily falling into theoretical dogma. Therefore, teachers should fully recognize the humanization, modernization, and digitalize of high-quality curriculum education in terms of target requirements, key content, and transformation path, and carry out high-quality practice from three aspects: teacher literacy, curriculum construction, and classroom teaching. On this basis, for the education effects of a single course, quality evaluation can be carried out from the aspects of goal setting, content selection, method implementation, and result presentation, thereby further promoting the high-quality development of curriculum education.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

吴能表,石定芳.高校课程育人:本真、理路与评价[J].重庆师范大学学报社会科学版,2024,(2):49-56

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-06-05