省域数字经济发展水平提升路径研究
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

F12

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金一般项目“多方法融合视角下高价值专利挖掘及影响因素识别研究”(24BTQ036)


Research on the Improvement Path of Digital Economy Development in Provinces
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    数字经济作为推动我国经济结构优化与质量提升的核心引擎,其发展水平的影响因素与驱动机制已成为学术界和政策制定者关注的焦点。深入研究其内在逻辑,对丰富相关理论认知、优化区域政策设计具有重要价值。在“技术—组织—环境”(TOE)经典框架的基础上进行调试与拓展,构建一个整合性的多维度分析框架,并采用模糊集定性比较分析方法(fsQCA),对我国省级行政区的数字经济发展水平展开组态效应研究。主要研究发现:(1)单一影响因素难以独立推动数字经济的高水平发展,其中创新发展环境作为核心条件,表现出较强的普适性和基础性作用;(2)识别出三种驱动数字经济高质量发展的典型模式,分别为“双核支撑驱动型”“多元叠加主导型”和“协同共生融合型”,反映了不同要素组合所形成的差异化路径;(3)在特定情境下,数字基础设施与数字化治理环境两类因素可相互替代,通过不同机制实现“殊途同归”的发展提升效果。进一步跨区域案例比较表明,东部、中部与西部地区的数字经济驱动路径存在显著差异,体现出鲜明的地域特征与发展阶段性。本研究从组态视角揭示了数字经济发展背后多重并发因素的复杂互动关系,为地方人民政府因地制宜制定差异化发展策略提供了理论依据与实践参考。

    Abstract:

    As the core engine driving the optimization and quality enhancement of China’s economic structure, the influencing factors and driving mechanisms of the development level of the digital economy have become a focal point for both academia and policymakers. In-depth research into its intrinsic logic holds significant value for enriching relevant theoretical understanding and optimizing regional policy design. This paper adjusts and extends the classic “Technology-Organization-Environment” (TOE) framework to construct an integrated multi-dimensional analytical framework. Using the fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) method, it conducts a configurational effect study on the development level of the digital economy across China’s provincial-level administrative regions. The main findings include: (1) A single influencing factor is insufficient to independently drive high-level digital economy development, with the innovation development environment, as a core condition, demonstrating strong universality and foundational role. (2) Three typical models driving high-quality digital economy development are identified: dual-core support-driven, multi-factor superposition-dominated and synergistic symbiosis-integrated reflecting differentiated pathways formed by different factor combinations. (3) Under specific circumstances, digital infrastructure and digital governance environments can substitute for each other, achieving “different paths leading to the same destination” in terms of development enhancement through different mechanisms. Further cross-regional case comparisons reveal significant differences in the driving pathways of the digital economy among eastern, central, and western regions, highlighting distinct geographical characteristics and developmental stages. From a configurational perspective, this study uncovers the complex interplay of multiple concurrent factors behind digital economy development, providing theoretical foundations and practical references for local governments to formulate differentiated development strategies tailored to local conditions.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

奉国和,邱婧.省域数字经济发展水平提升路径研究[J].重庆师范大学学报社会科学版,2025,(5):78-90

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-11-22
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码