技术封建主义思潮的演进逻辑及本质澄明
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金青年项目“新时代中国共产党资本观研究”(24CKS026)


The Evolutionary Logic and Essential Clarification of Techno-Feudalism Thought
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    数字资本主义的快速发展,为技术封建主义思潮的滋生提供了社会温床。塞德里克·迪朗将技术封建主义思潮带入大众视野,其提出的理论框架虽然为观察资本主义数字技术现象提供了一定的视角,但未能触及资本运作的本质逻辑。脱胎于技术加速主义的技术封建主义,实则与技术同资本深度捆绑——这种捆绑同技术巨头攫取政治特权、数字平台无序扩张催生“技术封地”、以知识产权为幌子掠夺“云地租”等问题紧密勾连。数字资本主义政治、经济和文化层面的异化性变革,共同催生了技术封建主义这一掩盖资本剥削本质的社会思潮。从马克思主义政治经济学批判立场出发,可以发现科技巨头的政治特权本质上是数字资本主义时代资本与技术联姻的结果;信息数据的一体化发展是数字信息产业扩张及新型行业衍生的产物;而无形资产租金是资本家追求剩余价值的体现。技术巨头通过控制关键技术和数据资源获取利润的方式,没有超越剩余价值理论,也没有改变传统的资本主义生产关系,技术封建主义本质上是数字资本主义亚形态。为此,澄明技术封建主义思潮的演进脉络与本质,从其暴露的矛盾中总结对中国特色社会主义数字经济发展具有警示意义的教训,从社会主义民主政治建设、公有资本主导引领和公共数据平台构建方面加强数字经济建设,对探索具有人类文明新形态意义的数字文明具有重要理论和现实意义。

    Abstract:

    The rapid development of digital capitalism has laid the social foundation for the emergence of the techno-feudalism. Cedric Durand brought techno-feudalism into the public spotlight, providing a theoretical framework for understanding and analyzing the phenomena of capitalist digital technology. Evolved from technological accelerationism, techno-feudalism is closely linked to the alliance between technology and capital, which enables tech giants to monopolize political privileges, the unlimited expansion of “technological fiefdoms” driven by the growth of digital platforms, and the “cloud rent” underpinned by intellectual property rights. The political, economic, and cultural transformations of digital capitalism collectively shape the techno-feudalism social ideology. From the critical perspective of Marxist political economy, it becomes evident that the political privileges of tech giants are essentially a product of the marriage between capital and technology in the era of digital capitalism; the integrated development of information and data is a necessity for the growth of the digital information industry and the emergence of new sectors; and the rental value of intangible assets reflects capitalists’ pursuit of surplus value. By controlling key technologies and data resources to generate profits, tech giants neither transcend the theory of surplus value nor alter the traditional capitalist production relations. Techno-feudalism is, in essence, a sub-form of digital capitalism. Therefore, clarifying the evolution and nature of techno-feudalism, drawing lessons from experiences that benefit the development of China’s socialist digital economy, and strengthening digital economy construction through socialist democratic politics, the guidance of shared capital, and the development of data platforms hold significant theoretical and practical importance for exploring a new form of digital civilization with implications for human civilization.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

胡博成,李盼盼.技术封建主义思潮的演进逻辑及本质澄明[J].重庆师范大学学报社会科学版,2025,(6):96-106

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-02-02