人工智能时代高校教师教学新生态及应对策略
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

中国教育学会教育科研“师范教育协同提质计划”专项重点课题“数字化时代背景下教师教育课程资源体系与建设机制研究”(202400002209ZXB)


The New Teaching Ecology and Response Strategies of University Teachers in the Era of Artificial Intelligence
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    人工智能正以算力、算法与数据洪流,把高等教育推向“社会—技术”同步进化的临界点。生态学的适应性、多样性、平衡性、动力性与共同演进性为高校教师提供了驾驭这场变革的“生存法则”。适应性促使教师随学科前沿与社会需求适时更新课程大纲;多样性要求教师为不同认知风格的学生预留差异化生态位;平衡性提醒教师在算法决策与价值判断间实现人机协同;动力性帮助教师把学习行为数据转化为能量流;共同演进性则使教师转换为“生态工程师”,形成“师—生—机”协同进化体,要求高校教师形成“教材—内容—方式—环境—评价—关系”六维协同的新生态。教材层面,以数字教材为核心,构建覆盖课程群、跨学科、可进化的“活教材”;内容层面,依托生成式大模型,打造实时更新、情境化、可定制的“云资源库”;方式层面,推行“人机双师”协同教学,满足跨时区、跨校区、跨文化的多元学习需求;环境层面,建设支持多模态交互、数据驱动决策、情境感知的“智慧超脑”,实现“场景即课程”“空间即学伴”;评价层面,构建“证据—算法—伦理”三维平衡的闭环系统,强化多源数据、多元主体、多阶段反馈;关系层面,确立“师—生—机”三元协同结构,教师转换为学习设计师与价值守护者,学生成为自我建构的主体,机器升级为认知伙伴与道德中介,三者共同演进、共生共赢。面对社会生态与教育生态的双重变迁,高校教师亟须提升自身智能素养、数据伦理与终身学习能力;高校应加快基础设施、组织制度与文化范式的智慧升级;教育行政管理部门需前瞻性地制定标准、法规与激励政策,引领人工智能时代的高等教育向更具包容性、创新性、可持续性的方向发展。

    Abstract:

    Artificial intelligence, powered by exponential growth in computing, algorithms and data, is pushing higher education to a tipping-point “where social and technological evolutions occur in sync”. The five laws of ecology—adaptability, diversity, balance, dynamism and co-evolution—now serve as “survival rules” for university teachers facing this disruption. Adaptability forces instructors to let syllabi mutate in real time with disciplinary frontiers and social needs. Diversity demands that they carve out differentiated niches for students of varying cognitive styles; balance reminds them to keep human-AI collaboration in equilibrium between algorithmic decisions and value judgments. Dynamism converts learning-behavior data into energy flows that fuel continuous innovation; co-evolution turns teachers into “ecosystem engineers” who, together with students and intelligent agents, form a tripartite, mutually enhancing organism. These laws converge into a six-dimensional symbiotic ecosystem: “digital textbooks, resources, methods, environments, assessment and relationships”. At the textbook level, living, cross-disciplinary, course-clustered digital texts evolve continuously; at the resource level, generative large models maintain “a cloud repository” that updates in real time, is context-rich and customisable. At the method level, human-AI “dual-teacher” instruction meets multi-time-zone, multi-campus and multicultural demands. At the environment level, multi-modal, data-driven, context-aware “smart brains” turn “every scene into curriculum and every space into a learning companion”. At the assessment level, an “evidence-algorithm-ethics” balanced loop integrates multi-source data, multiple stakeholders and multi-stage feedback. At the relationship level, “the teacher-student-AI” triad co-evolves: teachers become learning designers and value guardians, students self-construct knowledge, and machines act as cognitive partners and ethical mediators. Amid simultaneous shifts in social and educational ecosystems, university teachers must urgently upgrade their AI literacy, data ethics and lifelong learning capacity; universities should accelerate the intelligent upgrading of infrastructure, governance and culture; education authorities must formulate forward-looking standards, regulations and incentives to steer higher education toward greater inclusivity, innovation and sustainability in the age of artificial intelligence.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

杨如安.人工智能时代高校教师教学新生态及应对策略[J].重庆师范大学学报社会科学版,2026,(1):37-47

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-04-06