21世纪核心素养的国际比较研究——兼论中国学生发展核心素养框架的特色
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

G623

基金项目:

广东省哲学社会科学创新工程第三批特别委托重大项目“广东省拔尖创新人才的科学选拔、动态培养与输送衔接机制研究”(GD25WTCXGC10);广东省本科高校教学质量与教学改革工程项目“多智能体赋能的‘跨创融合’复合型人才培养模式与实践研究”(2024-602)


An International Comparative Study of 21st-Century Competencies-—With a Discussion on the Characteristics of China’s Core Competencies Framework
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    核心素养是全球教育改革的关键出发点。以《中国学生发展核心素养》六大素养、十八项要点为参照,将核心素养置于国际视野下进行要素比较和焦点分析,有助于明晰我国素养本位教育改革的育人重点。研究发现:我国框架基本涵盖国际各类主流素养要素,其中社会责任、信息意识、自我管理、批判质疑、问题解决、健全人格最受关注。审视国内外核心素养框架,发现以共识居多,均以知识创新为目标,重视批判思维、创新思维、元认知能力的发展;并以数智社会的可持续发展为基础,强调信息素养、自我管理、公民素养的培养。也存在一些差异:国际框架体现心智导向,注重技能优先,以高阶思维能力与实际问题解决为核心;我国重视美德导向,强调价值观念浸润,以人文素养、家国情怀为基底。本研究揭示了《中国学生发展核心素养》在“全球共识”与“本土特质”之间的辩证统一,可为完善我国核心素养教育理论体系与实践路径提供有益参考。

    Abstract:

    Core competencies have become a central focus of global education reform. Using the six domains and eighteen key elements outlined in the Core Competencies for Chinese Students’ Development as the analytical framework, this study conducts a comparative and focus-based analysis of core competencies from an international perspective. The analysis helps to clarify the key priorities of China’s competency-based education reform and to advance the autonomous construction of discourse in basic education curriculum and instruction. Findings indicate that China’s framework largely covers the mainstream elements emphasized internationally, among which social responsibility, information awareness, self-management, critical inquiry, problem-solving, and sound personality development receive the highest attention. Overall, there is significant international consensus: global frameworks commonly emphasize knowledge innovation, focusing on critical thinking, creative thinking, and metacognitive skills; they also stress the cultivation of information literacy, self-management, and civic competence in response to the sustainable development demands of a digital and intelligent society. Nevertheless, notable differences remain. International frameworks tend to prioritize skills, centering on higher-order thinking and practical problem-solving as core cognitive models. In contrast, the Chinese framework emphasizes the infusion of values, grounded in humanistic literacy and patriotic sentiments, and is characterized by a virtue-oriented approach to holistic development. Looking ahead, competency-based educational practice in China should align with the strategic context of developing new productive forces, redefining the contemporary connotation of core competencies; leverage “curriculum-based ideological and political education” to guide values cultivation and internalization; and adopt interdisciplinary education as a key pathway to integrate global consensus with Chinese characteristics, thereby enhancing students’ essential capabilities and moral character in a holistic manner.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

吕思源,詹泽慧.21世纪核心素养的国际比较研究——兼论中国学生发展核心素养框架的特色[J].重庆师范大学学报社会科学版,2026,(2):79-94

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-06-01
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码