数字社会工作服务的中西互鉴与本土探索
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

C916

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金西部项目“空间理论视域下青少年虚拟社交风险的生成机理与网络社会工作介入研究”(23XSH005)


文化与社会学
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    随着数字中国建设与基层治理现代化的深入推进,我国数字社会工作服务在迎来广阔发展空间的同时,也面临诸多现实挑战,亟待构建适应本土制度逻辑与治理场景的自主知识体系。对社会工作数字化演进过程的比较分析表明,中西数字社会工作服务在技术应用轨迹上高度相似,但在政治逻辑、任务目标与实践路径上存在本质分野。西方以专业自治、市场运作为核心逻辑,构建起涵盖法治化伦理约束、行业化自治治理、精准化服务供给、全周期人才培育的实践体系,而我国则呈现出党建引领、系统整合、治理与服务双向赋能的鲜明特征。立足西方经验参照与本土制度优势,中国特色数字社会工作应在伦理规范、行业治理、服务供给与人才培育四个维度推进本土探索,构建法治框架与党建引领双向融合的伦理体系、党建引领与专业协同并重的治理格局、技术赋能与基层治理深度嵌入的服务模式、政校企社全链条协同的人才培养机制,最终形成以人民为中心、党建引领、服务治理协同的中国方案。

    Abstract:

    With the in-depth advancement of digital China construction and the modernization of primary-level governance, digital social work services in China are embracing broad development prospects while also being confronted with numerous practical challenges, creating an urgent need to establish an independent knowledge system adapted to China’s local institutional logic and governance scenarios. A comparative analysis of the digital evolution of social work indicates that digital social work services in China and the West follow highly similar trajectories in technology application, yet exhibit fundamental divergences in terms of political logic, mission objectives, and practical pathways. The West, with professional autonomy and market operation as its core logic, has developed a mature practice system encompassing law-based ethical constraints, industry-led autonomous governance, targeted service delivery, and full-cycle talent cultivation. In stark contrast, China’s practice demonstrates distinctive features of Party building leadership, systematic integration, and the two-way empowerment of governance and services. Drawing on Western experience and China’s inherent institutional strengths, digital social work with Chinese characteristics should advance localized exploration across four dimensions: ethical norms, industry governance, service delivery, and talent cultivation. At the practical level, efforts focus on forging an ethical system featuring two-way integration between the rule of law framework and Party building leadership, as well as a governance pattern that balances centralized Party building guidance and professional synergy. Complementing these are a service model embedding technology empowerment deeply into primary-level governance, and a whole-chain collaborative talent training mechanism that unites the government, universities, enterprises and social organizations. These localized practices will ultimately give shape to a people-centered Chinese solution underpinned by Party building leadership and oriented toward the integration of service and governance.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

刘斌志,兰梦娇.数字社会工作服务的中西互鉴与本土探索[J].重庆师范大学学报社会科学版,2026,(4):120-131

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-09-17
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码